Saturday, August 26, 2023

Why English Press likes to Talk About So Called Strongman Stereotype



Media sometimes likes to talk about so call strongman type. Often pundits go in great length about how, according to them, some people like this type of leader and consistently reelect them and backslide from democracy.

Often Vladimir Putin of Russia is presented as one of such types.

As someone who actually was born and grew up in Russia, I can tell that that is not how it actually works. I made another blog post on this recently. In fact, is is not even how it looks from Moscow or from a perspective of someone who lived there for almost 20 years.

However why the very idea that a 'strongman type' has its appeal does have such broad discussions in English speaking press.

Perhaps the answer lies deep in history. British islands perhaps were the only country that mostly benefited from protection of a strong authority and rarely suffered from tyranny a strongman can inflict upon people. Even when they did, they often could eventually depose such a tyrannical overlord and the whole ordeal seemed more like and exception than a rule.



Even back in Roman times when Romans conquered modern England and Wales and build a Hadrian Wall, they did it to keep Picts in what is nowadays Scotland from raiding and pillaging the south.

Roman authority brough with it peace and protection to those south of the wall.

During the third century crisis when various roman generals would proclaim themselves and then go to fight others just like them for control over the empire. They will come and bring war, pillage and tyranny upon people who were caught in the middle of the conflict.

However, that would happen mostly to other provinces of Rome. After all opportunistic generals and their armies would like to if not conquer themselves the whole empire, then at least grab a wealthy and prosperous part of it. Because Britannia was rather poor compared to other Roman provinces, no legion ever came to invade and conquer it. However, plenty probably left it to conquer themselves something more lucrative further south, leaving the Brits to the mercy of the Picts and Scots. For people of other provinces, Roman armies were often looters and oppressors rather than protectors form hostile neighbors. For ancient Britannia they perhaps were mostly protectors from Picts and Scots.




That more or less continued in later times as well. Saxons protected Brits from Vicing Raids. Normans who conquer and expelled Saxon rulers, did it fast and without too much impact on common people. Then they went to actually expand into Wales and Ireland. They even tried to subjugate Scotland.

Each new dynasty on the throne added some land to the Crown and expanded horizons for British people.

England especially mostly benefitted than suffered from these types of people. That is why this stereotype of a benevolent strongman exist in English psyche even if most people nowadays support democracy. 

However, world's experience with strongman types were different and the reasons modern dictators can stay in power in various countries are vastly different from so called 'strongman appeal'. 

Putin's Empire was built on lies.

As I was consistently saying in my many blog posts it is lies rather than strongman appeal that keeps Putin in power.

To put it simply they tell people that the collective West intends to genocide Russia and all ethnic Russians and Putin is the only thing that stops them. 

As someone who lived in Australia for more 16 years idea that the collective West intends to genocide Russia is laughable. However, that does not stop people like Dmitri Kiselev and Vladimir Solovyev and rather personalities on Russian TV to claim that the threat is real. 

The less ordinary inhabitant of Moscow has exposure to any alternative sources of information and opinions, the more likely they will choose Putin over a certain genocide promised to them by Putin's propaganda machine.

To make sure alternative options do not spread in Russia, they ban independent media and put all those who question truthfulness of Western genocidal intentions in prisons.

Thus, lies from Ostankino tower reign in Moscow and prop Putin's build on ignorance Empire.

I do hope the truth will indeed prevail one day.



Picture is a North Korean propaganda poster that shows US soldiers throwing Korean babies in a well to their death for no reason at all.

The kind of propaganda that mobilizes North Korean public to support Kim's regime as an alternative to having their babies slaughtered for no reason at all. Dictatorial minds think alike, both in Russia and North Korea.

However, what would happen to their support for Kim of they find out that they have no real reason to fear this happening to their babies. To put is simply Kim would not last too long in power, if the truth will become a common knowledge in his 'hermit kingdom'.

Monday, August 14, 2023

Alternative proposals for new Australian Flag

  












Why Things are Shit Since Financial Crisis of 2008

 

This breakneck productivity problems exists precisely because we have overpopulation problem.

We have more people than there are jobs. So employers own the game. If you do not like their shitty conditions then there are thousands of others who are ok with that.

People driven by something like sense of duty or desire to contribute to community will probably work even if business pay them nothing. 

So from a business perspective anyone who wants a pay is not competitive and not fit for a job.

Without pay anyone sane has not reason to work.


More on how it came to be this way:

Since 1980s when factories started to become automated. Before automation they employed thousands of people each.

Even events like Youngtown in the US, Thatcher firing miners and miners protests in the UK, even collapse of the USSR. All happened because of that new fundamental change to the world order.

After automation all these former factory workers are pushed into a ever shrinking job market to compete for remaining jobs.

Automation destroys more and more jobs. So surplus of people gets bigger and bigger. Employers take advantage of the situation and government does nothing to rule in it.


The only two real solutions is either Universal Basic Income or a gigantic massacre that will wipe out the surplus of population.

However businesses do not want UBI since it will eliminate their advantage. Governments are wary there are still jobs that cannot be automated 

I would prefer UBI now, however let there be suicides and a giant massacre if there is no UBI.

If we do nothing, the misery will only keep increasing.


Boomers owe their, unconcerned with material needs, happy go lucky (all you need is love) youth to Adolf Hitler and WWII.

Unfortunately there was no one amount them who could achieve a similar prosperity for us Millennials. COVID killed measly 6.5 millions so far. WWII casualties were 75-80 millions. I think we need at least 200 million this time, pick up the pace COVID

All boomers do is desperately cling to their useless lives and waste our limited financial resources on various medical treatments to give themselves another 5 or so useless pathetic years of 'living'. At least my parents of 1954 are like that.

Kudos to those who are not like that. Who never spent big money on medical treatment to prolong their lives another 5 years.

How Russian and North Korean Propaganda Works

 

Putin and his associates basically monopolised all TV and maybe even newspapers very early on in his rule. I think he completed it by 2002. I remember some TV channels, critical of him, struggling to survive this purge, but ultimately failing. 


After that Ryazan home bombing incident in 1999 where NTV connected FSB and Putin personally to the explosions. Russian apartment bombings - Wikipedia The original conspiracy theory that actually holds some water compared to say 9/11 conspiracy theories. Putin got angry, his friends bought NTV and purged all the staff members, so that people who reported about the incident and blamed it on Putin and FSB will no longer be on air to do something like that again. They switched to TV6, but Putin shut that down as well. Then they switched to TVS, but Putin got them there as well. From there on no one on TV reports stuff that Putin does not like.

Since then all people in the media are like Dmitriy Kiselev and Vladimir Soloviyov who keep telling people all sorts of lies about anything really. For example, there are Nazi in Ukraine. Their narrative goes something like that: 

Nazi in Ukraine abuse, murder and harass poor innocent people of Ukraine. Russia and Putin try to stop these abuses. However, the evil West are being mean about it, trying to choke Russia with sanctions and what not. Then they further say since the US, Europe and the West support Nazi in Ukraine then they are closet Nazi themselves. They all are bad guys therefore.

It is with lies like that they mobilise the population against the West and in support of Putin. Those whose English language ability and computer skills are poor have no other news but these, so they are completely brainwashed by Putin's propaganda machine.

They also forged evidence of 'crimes' that Ukrainian Nazi have committed and showed them on TV like these are real things.



That was in 2019. At one place where I once lived there was a TV in the laundry and it was tuned to SBS that broadcasts foreign news occasionally. One time they broadcast the Russian 1st Channel. And the main segment was dedicated to Ukraine. Russian news interviewed staffers of a Ukrainian newspaper in Kyiv who had their office blown up by a grenade launcher. They did not show much footage of actual damage (since there was none of course). However the newspaper staffer told Russian journalists that people who did that most likely wanted to shut the paper down because of their pro-Russian stance. They also complained that Ukrainian Police would not do anything about it because they are anti-Russian.

The whole news segment is of course a complete lie and completely made up by Russian TV 'journalists'. There was no explosion in Kyiv that day. A newspaper was probably also a fake, and the person they interviewed probably did not do anything else but played various roles for the Russian TV fake news.

However, if people do not know it is a lie, they will think that something like that is horrible, and someone has to do something about these crazy people that blew up newspaper offices with grenade launchers. 

Because of the news segments like that back then, now Putin tells them that his invasion in Ukraine is just to stop people with grenade launchers from blowing up news paper's offices. 

Believers of course think it is the right thing to do. Those who know the truth are appalled and disheartened by how much power Putin's lies have.

Many of these TV people in Russia have their offices in the Ostankino broadcasting tower. The tower is often called Ostankino Syringe. A very fitting sobriquet, considering the lies they spread over the country from there are as bad as something like Heroin. Putin's power really lies in that tower. Lenin once said that 'religion is opium for the masses'. I would say totalitarian propaganda is heroin for the masses.





More on the internet, since Putin can't control or censor the internet, he is concerned that it can eventually ferment an uprising against his rule, like it did in Georgia, Ukraine and Moldova before. In Belarus as well, though Lukashenka managed to suppress the protest there. I am not sure if Putin lent him some Russian riot police to do that. There were speculations like that.

Putin can't just ban the internet altogether like another concerned dictator, Kim Jong Un of North Korea. They have media like in Russia and ban not only the Internet, but also computers, mobile phones. They even run distortion generators to prevent people from tuning in to South Korean radio.

Because, with the internet North Korean people can find out that the rest of the world does not starve even more than they are, as their own media claim. They may also find out that the US did not kill all the men, rape al the women and drowned all children in South Korea, like North Korean media says they did. All of that might make them disillusioned and angry with a regime and ferment a revolution.

How to Really Defeat Putin and His Lies

 

I guess I needed to make it more clear that those who are good with English or Internet know the truth. Like all visitors to this forum for example.

Younger generations (40 years old and younger) are proficient with these things and know the truth.

It is older generations who never learned English at school during Soviet times and afraid to touch computers just in case are susceptible to the propaganda. These guys have nothing other than propaganda TV.

As times goes younger post-Soviet generations slowly displacing older Soviet ones. That concerns Putin and co. 

Since younger gens do not like him and think he is ruining their future they might get to organize something like Euromaidan in Ukraine and replace Putinist regime with a democratic young people rule.

That happened in Georgia, Ukraine Moldova, Armenia. Almost happened in Belarus in 2020. There were protests in 2012 and 2020 in Russia. 

So Putin is concerned for his fate. After Euromaidan Yanukovich and his crew fled to Russia to avoid going to trial for all the embezzlement he and associates done. Ukraine and the world want them arrested, but Russia is one of few dictator friendly countries out there. 

Putin's case is even grimmer, there is no any other dictator friendly countries further east of Russia that would refuse arrest and extradition request from new Russian government that would replace Putin's regime.

So he and his crew clings to power as if his very life depends on it. 

Because it's kind of does.


In a way this war is way for Putin to push younger people out of Russia, either to die in war or flee to the west. Either way they will not be in Moscow to start a Euromaidan, so it works for Putin.

Just found a video of how Joseph Goebbels depicted WWII to the German Public

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mgLyBiJlmZc&ab_channel=CriticalPast

In summary: it all chill, women welcome us as liberators and give us flowers, no one dies. Nothing to worry about.

I guess until allies took Berlin, German public did not knew better. Only after the war was over did they realized that it was far from how Goebbels depicted it.

Allies showed them concentration camps and Germans were shocked, they could not believe Hitler and NSDAP would do something like that.


I do not need to actually watch any Russain TV to tell that that Putin, Vladislav Surkov, Constantin Ernst, Dmitry Kiselev and Vladimir Solovyev depict their 'Special Military Operation' in much the same way.

Just so that truth does not accidently reach the public, they shit down all the independent Russian language media there like Echo Moskvy. So not so internet and English language savvy public is in the dark about war.

Paid war trolls know the truth but they are paid by Putin's government so they have vested interest to support Putin regardless.


Someone needs to break out the information blockade and tell the truth.


Putin lies because he needs to be seen by people in Russia as a good guy. He will very likely lose power if his evil nature is exposed. 

That is why he first made people believe in Nazi in Ukraine, then he convinced them that these Nazi commit crimes against humanity in Ukraine. From there on he can present his war as a war for a good cause, to stop these Nazi from committing their crimes against humanity.

From there on, if the West opposes Putin, those who believe in Nazi in Ukraine see the West as collaborators of these Nazi. From there on they can even think all of the West is Nazi sympathisers. That does not dissuade them from supporting Putin. From there on no matter how war actually goes they will not stop supporting him.

Many Western analysts fall for that trap and seem unable to get out of it.

Western powers should do more to address the original foundational lie about Nazi in Ukraine. 

As absurd as it might sound, the West should try to convince people in Russia that there are no any Nazi in Ukraine at all and they do not commit crimes against humanity at all. Once this foundational lie is gone, those built on top of it will collapse as well.

On Lifespans of Countries

 


Russian education is just completely corrupt and completely dysfunctional. Just like the rest of the country. Country is literally rotting away from within and dying. It will fall soon.


Countries too have an age span, they grow, reach peaks then decline and finally rot away and die. History teaches us this. Countries do live longer than people but principles are the same.

The Roman Empire for example too eventually reached the end of its life and died. It was not really destroyed by barbarians. To be precise barbarians found a dysfunctional society that was not capable or willing to defend itself. Greedy post Tetrarchy Emperors failed to pay soldiers their salaries, eventually fed up guards simply couldn't care less and opened the gates to barbarians. Well creatively enough some parts of Roman society actually hired these barbarians to guard them in place of dysfunctional armies and emperors. System gradually evolved into first de facto barbarian rule and then barbarian emperors.

The Afghan government did the same thing in 2021 and got the same outcome, as unpaid soldiers simply sat idly and let the Taliban take over. Well their 'leaders' who embezzled (kept for themselves) money meant for salaries, fled the country and are now spending all this cash somewhere in exile.

People remember Rome as it was during the times of Caesar and Augustus around 50BC, but by the time it finally collapsed in 476 it was far from that. 500 years can rot away even Rome.



I can give more modern examples of the Ottoman Empire and Polish Lithuanian Commonwealth.


Ottomans began as one of small beyliks that splintered away from the Seljuk Empire in the 12th century. They managed to get their government and military in order, embraced modern (for 12 century) military practices and technologies. Eventually all that allowed them to win many wars and expand their territories. 

Eventually around 1450 they scored many major victories and became a major power after they won the Battle of Varna in 1444 (start date of Europa Universalis IV) and took Constantinople in 1453. 

They peaked around 1529 when they almost took Vienna. It might as well be that they simply did not care much about taking it at the time. It was not that important of a city back then. 


By 1550 Ottomans controlled half of Mediterania and all of the Middle east.

for 100 years from there on there were some inconclusive wars that did not change situation much


The Second Battle of Vienna 1680 was a much different affair.


Ottomans lost and for the first time ended up losing significant parts of their pre-war territory.

More wars came after but Ottomans kept losing. They tried to modernize and keep up with their opponents but were unable to. Vested interests prevented them from changing. Janiassies that were very effective soldiers by 1450 standards, even best of their kind. By 1700 they were too old fashioned and incapable to keep up with development or war technology. However they were too powerful politically to be removed or reformed in any way. Any attempt to change that failed and the Ottomans collapsed.

Eventually at the end of WWI they finally fell completely both from inside and outside.Outside powers wanted to reduce their borders even more but the Mustafa Kemal Ataturk uprising managed to undo some of it. Mustafa Kemal abolished the old system, expelled the Sultan and Caliph and began a new modern Turkey, created from the ashes of the Ottoman Empire.



Poland and Lithuanian growth began somewhat earlier. Their finest moment was the Battle of Grunwald in 1410. There are monuments to this Battle even in the US King Jagiello Monument - Wikipedia

Eventually they consolidated their land and finished off Teutonic and Livonian Orders and reached their peak in when Poland and Lithuania formally united into a union state (kind of like a marriage between countries)


The union allowed the Polish Golden Age that lasted until the Khmelnitsky uprising.




From there on Poland was declining and eventually was partitioned by its three neighbours and disappeared from world maps for 123 years.


Here too the inability to reform and keep up with times destroyed a once large great power level state. Back after the first partition some parts of Commonwealth society proposed reforms but were defeated by vested interests of szlachta who did not want to lose their power.



Nowadays Poland is somewhat back into existence, but it is far from what it was back then.



Russia planted seeds of growth even before 1600.

During 1400 to 1600 Russia was small and was consolidating first those small principalities of former Kievan Rus that were not taken by Lithuania, they fought and annexed some remnants of Mongol Golden Horde Siege of Kazan - Wikipedia, first somewhat foreght conquest. Khanate of Kazan - Wikipedia This city is actually very close to Moscow geographically. That was soon followed by conquest of Astrakhan Khanate - Wikipedia

After that Russia took on great powers of these times Poland and Ottomans.

They used the above mentioned Khmelnytsky uprising to grow at the expense of Poland.

Russia managed to get powerful and relevant at 1721 when Peter I defeated Carolus Rex and his Ukrainian Hetmanate Allies under Poltava. Poltava was possibly Russian Grunwald.

Russia reached its peak in 1815 after the defeat of Napoleon. 200-250 years later compared to Poland and the Ottomans. At that time Russian borders included much of Poland and Lithuania. 

100 years later in 1917 October Revolution happened Similar to Polish Deluge. The collapse of USSR is similar to first partition of Poland-Lithuania

Then there was opposition to Yeltsin reforms by vested interests who did not want to lose power. Now they desperately cling to Putin as the country decays and collapses.

Fortunately I look at it from a safe distance.

House is on Fire. How Different Australian Parties would solve the problem.

 


I came up with it originally around 2016 elections. So, it references some of the policies from these times.


Recently I decided to write it down and add more modern stuff to it. 


Liberals:

Senate refuses to authorize us pouring petrol in fire by claiming it will make fire worse, so we want Double Dissolution to break the stranglehold. In the meanwhile, we will throw old carboard boxes, dried leaves, old tires and documental evidence of our corruption into the fire to make it str ... er ... I mean extinguish it of course.

Labor caused the fire. They have L plate on fire management, and we don't (have any).

We have many years of uninterrupted good fire management experience as there was no fires during Howard and Menzies eras.


Analysis. 

In touch with reality. Have sound understanding of the problem.

Too evil and malicious to actually solve it as they are paid off by developers who want to develop the plot once fire clears it out.

Just blames everything on Labor.


Labor:

We have recently completed a brand-new porch for the house. It is very modern and also has wheelchair lift to comply with disability regulations.

We have 100 more different ideas on how to improve the house and make it more modern and livable.

Liberals are too negative, vote for positive policies.


Analysis.

Wants to do good but completely out of touch with reality. All the improvements would not matter as fire will consume the entire house.


Greens:

Let's get to the nearest water supply pipe, plug the garden hose in somehow and start extinguishing the damn fire.

Also, we want three wheelchair lifts on the porch. As we lack creativity and simply steal Labor policies but triple them


Analysis.

They are most likely to actually extinguish the fire. They might also extinguish local water supply and cause a flood as they do that.

Libs hate them as they want to spend even more than Labor.


One Nation:

Fire was caused by a guy who was making BBQ too close to the building. Let's ban all BBQ and throw all stoves and ovens into fire to prevent this from ever happening again.


Analysis.

Has understanding of the problem and even has a solution. Propose a solution that is very un-Australian.


Nick Xenophon Team:

Lets revive Australian buckets and Australian creeks. We will use buckets to draw water from nearest creek and pour it on fire to extinguish it. We will walk by foot as we do that.

Also, fire was caused by pokies, not even I can explain how though.


Analysis.

A kind of common-sense solution that is likely to be insufficient to actually extinguish the fire. However good enough to nearly winning South Australian Premiership.


Palmer United Party/ United Australia Party:

We have the best pesticides and the best pest-control team to rid your home from fire ants in the most humane way possible.

None of the major parties have our pesticide.


Analysis.

Loosely sound like it is relevant to the problem. Really just promises whatever sounds well to catch as many disaffected voters as possible.


Teal independents:

...


Analysis.

By now people will vote for you simply because you are not any of the above or below.


Centre Alliance:

...


Analysis.

They keep winning their seats even without leadership or a program. Teal independents stole their strategy from them. 

Centre Alliance however hardly came up with this strategy as they simply do not know what to do after Nick Xenophon left them. Not that it prevents them from winning.


National Party:

What is this 'solution' thing you are talking about? What do you mean governance is not about sitting in a chair and picking a nose?


Analysis.

Outback votes for them anyway so they would not even bother to come up with any policies. They lose to KAP and independents only sometimes so no need to worry about it, right?


Katter's Australia Party:

Boils Billy in fire and willing to share it with everyone.

We do not have fire on houses up north, so you are welcome to move it.


Analysis.

They represent outback and try to solve their own problems.


Australian Conservatives:

We can be even more tory than Liberals. Vote for extra toryism.


Analysis,

It took Cory Bernardy so many years to realise that people do not vote for toryism. They are misled into voting for it. On the other hand, he probably just gave up on it without realizing why it failed.


Shooters, Fishers, Farmers:

We need to hurry and save all guns, fishing rods and other tools from a shed before fire gets there.


Analysis.

Vote them if guns and fishing rods matter more than homes. Still more adequate than some others on the list.


Fusion/Pirate Party:

We have solutions that will work, look at our many pages rocket science spreadsheets that outline how we are going to do it.


Analysis.

Too hard for most voters to understand. Will probably work better than what Greens have.

How to Solve Ukraine War

 

I recently got good idea on how to solve Ukraine war situation.

They should do massive land swap.

Ukraine should give Russia Crimea, Sevastopol, Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts. (Crimea and Donbass)

In exchange Russia should give Ukraine Belgorod, Kursk, Bryansk and Orel Oblasts.

That kind of exchange is fair territory wise and will make both countries more stable.


For Russia it will work because it will get all the regions it covets, in exchange for relatively insignificant from Moscow's point of view areas.

For Ukraine it will work because it will replace problematic regions with much more easily manageable ones as well as potentially much more profitable.


Why Crimea and Donbass are better off in Russia.

Both Crimea and Donbass are too heavily pro-Russian and their presence in the Ukrainian state makes it unstable as there areas heavily lean towards Russia and sabotage pro-western policy that the rest of the country favours.

Most of these areas are heavily populated pushing country overall population balance heavily east. Because of their high population they play disproportionally large role in the Ukrainian politics.


Finally, both Crimea and Donbass are economically unsustainable:

Crimea was a resort town in Soviet times, nowadays it is not so profitable or popular. Only people nostalgic for Soviet times would want to visit it. There are not enough of such nostalgic people to pay for the maintenance of the peninsula.

Sevastopol is a city built around Russian naval base. Both its identity and economy revolve entirely around this fact. Thus, it is hard to find any place in Ukraine for this town.

Donbass mining towns used to be profitable when coal was still mined in shafts underground. Nowadays open-pit mining made shaft mining too costly and uneconomic. Because of that coal mining Donbas struggles economically and is a heavy drain on Ukraine's budget. People of the region currently making money by working in construction in Russia.

Finally in Donbass most of the town are located very close to Russian border and probably heavily dependent on various infrastructure on the other side of the border.


Why Belgorod, Kursk, Bryansk and Orel are better replacement for Ukraine

The above mentioned four oblasts have plenty of land and not so heavy population.

Small population figures will make their integration into Ukraine easier.

The four oblasts' economies are diverse with predominance of the agriculture over other industries. That will make them a better fit with the rest of the Ukraine's economy compared to Crimea and Donbass.

Large land area will allow to further develop agriculture there and potentially unlock more profits. At the very least they will be less of a drain on the budget than Crimea and Donbass.

Belgorod itself is very close to Ukrainian border. The rest of the towns are somewhat close to each other and rather isolated from the rest of Russia. That will make their integration with Ukraine rather painless and smooth.

Finally, some towns in Bryansk Oblast, such as Starodub used to be part of Ukrainian State (Hetmanate created by Bohdan Khmelnitsky) in 17th centaury. Their transfer to Ukraine will make for a historic justice.

The four oblasts together with Kharkiv Oblast can even be organised into a Greater Slobozhanshina economic region.


Why is it good for Ukraine

Land swap will make country much more stable internally as most pro-Russian areas of the county will be transferred away into Russia and they will be replaced with potentially pro-Ukrainian areas. The four oblasts might find being part of Ukraine much better for them than being part of Russia and will not be a pro-Russian nuisance like Crimea and Donbass.

There will be much greater chance of lasting peace as Russia will gain many of its claims and objectives in Ukraine. Russia will likely not care much for 4 oblasts to bother taking them back. That will make 4 oblasts even less keen in trying to get back to Russia.

4 oblasts much less of a drain on a budget than Crimea and Donbass. Ukraine is a poor country so economically beneficial land swap should benefit the county overall and make Ukraine overall much more prosperous.


Why it is good for Russia

Surely Russia already controls many of the areas in question however far not all of it. Even that might change if Ukrainian counter-offensive succeeds. Continued war is a heavy drain on Russia's resources and can put country's stability in question. Ukraine has support of the West and will get more money and weapons in the long run. In contrast no one of importance supports Russia.

On the other hand, formal agreement with Ukraine will allow Russia to lift sanctions. 4 oblasts are not too much of a price for Russia to pay.

On the other hand, internationally recognised annexation of Crimea and Donbass can give Putin and his regime even greater boost of popularity among Russian jingoists. Russia will be able to claim full victory in their 'liberation of Donbass' war. With their control of the media, they will be able to spin it into full victory and whatever else they want.


Summary

Territory swap between Russia and Ukraine will be able to solve many problems and will make life better for everyone involved.

Actual borders do not have to include the entirety of oblasts in question. They can be adjusted to be more workable.

Later I will write another article on how to fix Russia.

How to Fix Russia. Create Veishnoria.

 

Many speculate that Putin goes to war because he or even Russians generally have a lot of irredentist and Imperialist ambitions. 

There are sure some people who have such ambitions and Putin likes to pamper them so that he can count on their support against other demographics. 

Putin went to war to keep his power. How that works is complex. I described it in one of my previous blogs here. However the fact that Putin needs war does not mean he needs to conquer Ukraine as he claims or even win at all.

In fact, an alternative solution that will shore up his power in Russia will work just as fine for him.

And I have that kind of solution.


What he needs it to move capital into Ekaterinburg and cede Moscow and surrounding areas into an independent nation. Actual borders can differ, but it will be alright if it will include Moscow, Tver, Novgorod, Pskov, Smolensk and Kaluga Oblasts.


Reasons to do it are explained in CGPGrey's Rules for Rulers video.

Both prosperous educated democracies and completely backward dictatorships are perfectly stable. Revolutions only happen is in the middle grey zone between two extremes, where there are some educated and connected people. So in order to become stable Russia either has to become fully educated, globally connected and prosperous, or in countrast completely backward and reactionary like North Korea and Turkmenistan.

Russia is unstable because it has two types of people:

Educated and westernised who are concentrated mostly in the capital. Then can use internet and speal English and access global information. Because they have access to it all they of course want freedom, democracy and quality of life things available in the West. No matter what Putin does he will not be able to convince them that undemocratic Putinism is better than the West.

Because this group is so well educated it is prone to emigration to the West, anti-Putin protests and even has potential for an insurgency similar to Ukrainian EuroMaidan.


However, there is also another Russia further away from the capital and western borders. These people are not so globally connected or educated. There few have internet or even offline computers. Few understand English language to communicate with their peers globally. 

Because they hardly understand what democracy even is, they do not especially want it. They do not understand difference in life between Russia and the West at all.

So far Putin was more of less reliant on this group to keep him in power. However, they are far in the hinterlands and those who hate him are in the same capital city he himself resides and works.


However, there is a simple solution to this problem. He can simply move capital further east away from western borders and then simply cede all the educated Russians into a new country.

The new country even has a name and a flag. Veishnoria with its white, blue and white flag will be a perfect name for this nation.

What Ukraine needs to win the war

 


Ukraine recently launched an offensive, but it is not going too well. However, analysts still fail to understand what prevents Ukraine from succeeding. The answer is simple even if not obvious.

Once Ukrainian drones destroyed all the Russia's more advanced weapons, Russia simply reverted to a WWI tactics of trenches and mass ground defense. While trenches cannot actually stop drones, from flying over them and do damage to them, drones cannot really damage trenches either.

Thus, we have a paradoxical situation on the battlefield. Ukrainian side can fly their drones all the way even to Moscow and literary blow-up Putin while he literary takes a dumb in the toilet in his office or private residence, making his very own joke from Chechen war era come true in such an ironic fashion. However, Ukraine cannot readily destroy any of the WWI defenses on the frontline and take any territory in Ukraine itself.

Back in 19th century one British analyst described potential war between Russia and UK as battle between elephant and a whale. Elephant is biggest on land and whale is biggest in the ocean. Neither of them can readily reach into the other's domain.

War between Ukraine and Russia is the battle of above-mentioned elephant with an eagle, falcon or a hawk. Elephant cannot reach a falcon who flies in the sky, but neither a falcon can readily do anything about this massive think skinned elephant. 

Because of that for an entire year and a half we see elephant repeatedly ramming its head into a tree where falcon nests, hoping to dislodge its nest or at least get on its nerves. Falcon occasionally flies out of its nest to drive elephant away but cannot readily penetrate its think skin to be anything more than annoyance. So, for now, it is a stalemate.

Solutions

However fundamentally Ukraine has an advantage in this fight. On the ground it can hold the line and prevent Russia from advancing. Its drones have uncontested control of the skies.

Thus, there is two strategies Ukraine can use.

Attack City of Moscow Directly 

One option that is possible with current armaments is to ignore the ground defenses and attack Moscow directly. Russia currently has nothing to stop such attacks, so Ukraine has free choice of targets.

This of course requires expansion of the scope of warfare to Russian core territory. Some might not like such escalation so some political negotiations and discussions may be necessary with the US and EU.

To make it effective Ukraine should clearly identify key leaders that have authority to order Russian troops back and threaten them with death if they refuse to order such retreat. If they can identify and then kill someone close to Putin personally or Shoigu that will make them think about continuing the war. 
Choice of target is important as if they kill someone unimportant like Dugin's daughter or even Dugin himself, then it would not bother Putin or his cronies that much. In fact, they will simply use this as a propaganda tool on their TV.

It has to be someone who actually works in either Presidential Administration, some key ministries such as Defense (Shoigu's ministry) or their relatives.


The drawback of such plan is that Russia could be prepared for that and keep its key leaders protected in some underground bunkers, where drones cannot reach.

Alternative subplan it to target Russia's broadcasting capabilities.


Alternatively, Ukraine can attack their broadcasting capacities: Ostankino and Shabalovka towers and take their propaganda machine offline.

Without ability to frame war the way he wishes it to be framed, Putin will have a hard time maintaining continues support for the war among Russian public and even continues support for his rule in Russia.

The advantage of this version of the plan is that Russian government cannot readily hide or protect its huge broadcasting towers. Without them a lot of people will not be able to tune it for their usual dose of entertainment mixed with government propaganda. Then people will start noticing alternative points of view as well as reality around them.

This can force Putin to negotiate or withdraw, but it can also force him to do something even more risky.

It is possible to destroy just Shabalovka tower first to see how he will react. Then threaten to take down Ostankino as well if he will not back down.

Propaganda is important to Putin so that will surely make an impact.


Use WWII weapons to destroy WWI era defenses.

However, if war necessarily has to be kept in Ukraine's own territory, then they Ukraine needs some weapons that can effectively destroy WWI era defenses.

Modern US military has surprisingly little of them left in service. Nowadays the US can rely on Air Force's air superiority doctrine to win. Once air superiority is established, targeted attacks against key installations of the opponents are often enough to disable their ability to resist any further. Mostly by threatening them into surrender.

However, against such deeply digged-in country that relies on underground bunkers, secrecy and disguise to keep key personnel safe, while simply keeping general population and even frontline soldiers unprotected and exposed to death.

Russian defenses in Ukraine are cheap WWI style and easy to destroy. However, they are simply too numerous to Hellfire armed Bayraktar and other such smart weapons.

Tanks and IFV can cross trenches, but anti-personel and anti-vehicle minefields in front of these trenches do stop them.

Thus, a weapon that can make massive indiscriminate attacks into general direction of the enemy is needed. 

Simply carpet-bombing Russian defense lines can be one such solutions. Even a simple WWII bomber plane can possibly do it.

Alternative solutions it to use mass rocket artillery that Russia itself loves to use so much. The US used to have a few of such weapons, for example this one: M16 (rocket). However nowadays the US does not have that kind of weapon.

The closest thing would probably be Hydra, but that too is designed to be fired from air.

Ukraine often asks for more HiMARS as that is the closest thing they can find in the US arsenal, but HiMARS is way too selective in its firing capacities. It cannot deliver loads of cheap destructive firepower that is needed to destroy Russian defenses cost-efficiently.

Something simple and primitive is needed for a job. 

Alternative Subplan it to convince bulk of Russian forces to surrender.


To keep soldiers on the frontline, Russian command tells their soldiers that if they retreat, their own country will kill them for disobeying orders to hold the line. They also tell them if they surrender to Ukraine, they will instead be killed by mythological Ukraine's Nazis. This myth of Ukraine Nazis is essential to keep many of Russian troops on the front lines and preventing them from surrendering or defecting to Ukraine.

Because of the above it is theoretically it is possible to encourage many Russian soldiers to surrender to Ukraine, if Ukraine can successfully promise them safety. Here is is pointless to appeal to morale as this does not drive Russian army at all. Also, a promise of safety has to be somehow believable as they might not trust it easily, believing that Nazis are real and plan to exterminate them.

Perhaps a promise that they will be transferred to a western country, such as Germany can help.

More battle capable units such are VDV or gvardia (gvardeyskaya divison) will probably not surrender, but more ordinary units will be willing to do so.

Also, it is essential to talk to privates directly and not to sergeants or higher ranks. The higher their rank in the Russian military, the less likely they are to surrender. 

That is how Russian military works. They simply push all the actual work down to lowest most ranks, such as private and possibly efreytor. With sergeants and higher ranks only serve as enforcers and supervisors.

Privates of course resent this system. Some of them even gun down the sergeants Columbine Style, just to be court martialed and sentenced to death themselves afterwards. However most prefer to keep their lives in hope to exit the military eventually, or to be promoted to a sergeant and become an abuser themselves. 

Offering these guys, a safe way out of this mess will surely make many of them take the offer. However, it is also important to give them way out in such a way, that sergeants and other higher ranks would not be able to stop them.

Tuesday, August 8, 2023

On Work and Education.

By now education is more of a waste of time.

It does not guarantee good life and further and further out of touch with reality.

In fact abolishing it altogether would be useful, but conservative thinking people would agree with that.


We need more FRD-ims, Reaganism and Thatecherism to simply abolish outlived nonsense and move into a future.

We have industrial robots to manufacture things for us. Instead of simply abolishing work, like a smart people would do, government invents jobs simply to keep society how it was before industrial robots. This shitty jobs of course do not pay well as they are fundamentally useless. 

As jobs fundamentally do not matter, then management does not care if anyone hired to do that or not. In fact they even prefer that no one is hired to do it as it prevents money from being wasted. They hire moronic assinine HR who reject people left and right but pretend that they try to hire someone. That gives HR undue power and force everyone else to simply beg for a shitty jobs with shitty working conditions and work culture, or stay unemployed by choice if they are smart.

By now there is nothing left but an ugly hierarchies or people who are abused by their superiors and in turn abuse their subordinates.

We need a heartless, stubborn, uncompromising reformer (like Lelouch or people I mentioned above), who would simply destroy this stupid shit in one fell swoop. Who will ignore all the naysayers saying that it destroys society and what not, just as they used to when FDR made new deal or Thatcher fired all the miners. 


"Work is obsolete and everyone who disagrees is a braindead moron and should be exterminated together with the work and old world order." - Thor's manifesto.


Going back makes no sense. That is just like luddites back in the days were destroying factories because they took small artisans out of business and the artisans did not want to put up with that.

The kind of going back that will de-robotize and return jobs to humans even more absurd.

Why work when we can live in a utopia?


Boomers (hippies) and Generation W (yappies, early Gen X) problem is that that boomers refuse to see the future and Gen W actively work to prevent future from coming. They are modern luddites or the Holy League that wished to stop the spread ideas of French Revolution because they upset the existing order.

Back in the days Holy League opposed liberty and equality because they feared of losing their privileges to the common men. Their place on top of social pyramid in lucrative government positions was only guaranteed by the inequality system and losing it would mean losing power, money, status and everything really. They lost them in the end.

Nowadays boomers and Gen W also oppose robotization and abolition of work because even more absurd idea that 'people should work, duh'. Retards do not even have a real stake in it like priviledged classes of the Holy League, but still stubbornly resist it. Just because they hate Millennials and do not want us to have it easier than them. That kind of scum they are. Part of them are scum but the other part are oblivious to reality idiots. Surprising how former enemies (hippies and yappies) are now tightly united against late Gen X (work/life balance transitional generation) and Millennials (doomers, ninjas and grim reapers who will put an end to their shit eventually).

Finally all we need to do with withdraw health care and aged care and they will die out as they cannot survive on their own. In fact they are the most useless and worthless parasite, known to men. The parasite, government wants us to feed and take care of. Ridiculous I say.

On Recycling

  Among ecologically conscious people idea of recycling is very popular. They believe that saves the planet and what not and want to recycle...